Amending the constitution in Kyrgyzstan is supposed to be a lengthy and difficult process. Not something to be attempted lightly.
After the Kyrgyz parliament debated controversial plans to alter the balance of power between the prime minister and President Almazbek Atambayev, one lawmaker raised a basic objection: Did anyone know where the country's constitution was being kept? And was it even possible to amend it if the original could not be found?
The president's office came back with a clear answer: The justice ministry held the paperwork.
But the ministry wasn't so sure. The administration had it last, officials claimed.
Ordinary citizens had their own wry suggestions on where it may be. Could it be behind the cupboard? Or at the back of a presidential bookshelf?
Venera Koichiev of the BBC Kyrgyz service was one of those closely following the search.
“The minister said, ‘We think it has to be with the presidential administration.’ The presidential administration said, ‘No, it has to be with the justice minister.’ So everybody knew that that lovely, red-colored book is lost somewhere," Koichiev says.
One Russian satirist suggested that simply losing a constitution could become a less troublesome alternative for authoritarian leaders in other former Soviet republics. Why trample on the constitution when it is so much easier to just misplace it?
Eventually, the Kyrgyz president's office offered a new explanation for where the constitution was.
The original copy of the constitution was not lost, because it had never existed. There is no original copy of the constitution — just the text that was printed in newspapers in 2010.
From PRI's The World ©2016 PRI