On Monday, a decade-old deposition became the talk of the nation.
As we reported
The deposition was given by Cosby during the discovery phase of a civil lawsuit against the comedian. At the time, the judge presiding over the case sealed the records of the case while lawyers from both sides gathered evidence. While that was going on the two parties came to a settlement, signed a confidentiality agreement and the temporary seal — and the case for that matter — was forgotten.
So, how and why did this deposition become public now?
The simple answer is that after accusations of sexual assault re-emerged against Cosby, the Associated Press asked the court to unseal the documents and the court agreed.
Legally it's more interesting. U.S. District Judge Eduardo Robreno
issued a 25-page memo
-- The
court's rules
-- When the AP filed a request to have the documents unsealed, Cosby's attorneys objected, saying it would violate Cosby's right to privacy by making public, among other things, "intimate knowledge about his sex life." Cosby's lawyer also argued that the release would embarrass Cosby and would violate the confidentiality agreement signed by the two parties.
-- Robreno dismissed all those arguments.
-- Perhaps the most intriguing part is that Robreno concluded that Cosby should be thought of more as a public servant. Previous courts have held that public servants, or politicians, give up some of the privacy protections afforded to regular citizens or even public figures.
-- So, how did Robreno make that leap? He argued that while Cosby is clearly a public figure, when he talks about issues of public policy like unwed mothers and crime, he becomes a "public moralist," which, like it might for a public servant, opens him up to "legitimate public scrutiny." Robreno writes:
-- In the footnotes, Robreno specifically points out
Cosby's speech
-- The release of these documents,
Robreno argues
-- On the embarrassment claim, the judge counters:
Copyright 2016 NPR. To see more, visit
http://www.npr.org/