An international panel of surgeons and patients has challenged the effectiveness of one of the most common orthopedic procedures and recommended strongly against the use of arthroscopic surgery for patients with degenerative knee problems.
The guidelines,
published
Fewer than 15 percent of patients felt an improvement in pain and function three months after the procedure, and that those effects disappeared after one year, the review found. In addition, the surgery exposed patients to "rare but important harms," such as infection.
Casey Quinlan, 64, who had the surgery in 2003 and was on the panel issuing the guidelines, said her orthopedist told her the procedure would not only help restore mobility in her knee after a nasty ski accident but also improve her arthritis.
Quinlan, of Richmond, Va., said the procedure did not deliver, since her arthritis remained unchanged. "It was not what I was told to expect," she says.
In an
arthroscopic knee surgery,
The panel said meniscal tears "are common, usually incidental findings, and unlikely to be the cause of knee pain, aching or stiffness."
The panel said the surgery is performed more than 2 million times a year across the globe, and in the United States alone costs more than $3 billion annually.
The panel's recommendations are counter to guidelines from a number of medical groups. Most of those organizations have recommendations against arthroscopy for patients solely with arthritis that can be seen through an X-ray. But many still promote the procedure for people with ailments such as meniscal tears, which are frequently present in arthritic patients.
The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons does not recommend the treatment for patients with arthritis, said
David Jevsevar
"Guidelines don't apply to every patient," Jevsevar says. "There's always going to be an exception."
Reed Siemieniuk, a physician in Ontario, Canada, and the lead author of the panel's statement, said he understands the frustration some people may have about the guideline — especially those who have seen an improvement with surgery.
The strongest evidence of a procedure's benefit is a randomized controlled trial, Siemieniuk notes, "Despite those personal experiences that say it might be doing good, the evidence suggests that it might not be doing any good."
Siemieniuk said that the panel's reading of the studies suggests that "on average, the pain relief that you're getting is not going to be important to you at all."
The BMJ assessment is the latest in a string of studies that have raised concerns about the surgery. The journal also published a
study in 2015
The surgery was questioned in 2002 after
researchers reported
Copyright 2017 Kaiser Health News. To see more, visit
Kaiser Health News