;
;
; 07/07/09 7:30 PM
;
;;;; GREATER BOSTON
>> TONIGHT ON "GREATER BOSTON",
RISKY DECISION OR SMART
POLITICS?
STATE TREASURER TIM CAHILL ON
HIS PLAN TO LEAVE THE
DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
PLUS MEMORIAL FOR A KING.
AS MICHAEL JACKSON IS
EULOGIZED, HOW WILL HE BE
REMEMBERED?
Closed Captioning
brought to you by AFLAC:
Ask about it at work.
GOOD EVENING.
STATE TREASURER TIM CAHILL'S
DIGS TO QUIT THE DEMOCRATIC
PARTY AND RUN FOR GOVERNOR
SENT SHOCK WAVE AS CROSS
BEACON HILL TODAY.
AND THE REVERBERATIONS MAY NOT
STOP UNTIL A YEAR FROM
NOVEMBER.
BY DECLARING HIS POLITICAL AND
FISCAL INDEPENDENCE FROM DEVAL
PATRICK AND THE DEMOCRATIC
LEGISLATURE, POLITICAL
INSIDERS SAY CAHILL HAS
TRANSFORMED HIMSELF FROM AN
IMPOSSIBLE LONG SHOT TO A
POLITICAL WILD CARD.
AND HIS CANDIDACY COULD MAKE
THE NEXT YEAR'S GOVERNORS RACE
THE MOST INTERESTING ONE IN
RECENT MEMORY.
THEY SAY THE NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE
TASK OF FEEDING GOVERNOR
PATRICK IN A DEMOCRATIC
PRIMARY, TREASURER CAHILL'S
DECISION TO LEAVE THE PARTY
WAS LESS A MATTER OF WHY THAN
WHY NOT.
>> I THINK IF YOU TALK TO HIS
PEOPLE THEY'LL SAY, GEE, THE
MAJORITY OF VOTERS IN THE
STATE ARE INDEPENDENT ANY WAY.
IF WE'RE RUNNING AGAINST A
STACKED DECK IN THE PRIMARY,
WHY NOT TAKE AN OUTSIDE RUN.
>> JIM O'SULLIVAN SAYS THE
BOLD MOVE IS A WORRY TO BOTH
GOVERNOR PATRICK AND TO
REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS LIKE
BUSINESSMAN CHRISTIE MIHOS AND
POSSIBLY HARVE VARD PILGRIM
HEALTH CARE C.E.O. CHARLIE
BAKER.
>> FOR ANY NUMBER OF REASONS
TIM CAHILL COULD BE A
PALATABLE CANDIDATE.
>> JIM MALONE WHO
UNSUCCESSFULLY CHALLENGED PAUL
CELLUCCI IN 1998 GIVES CAHILL
CREDIT FOR GUTS, BUT SAYS HE'S
CRAWLED ONTO A DANGEROUS
POLITICAL LIMB.
>> HE'S BURNING BRIDGES, THIS
IS A LEAP ON HIS PART WHERE I
DON'T THINK HE EVER GETS TO GO
BACK AND BE A DEMOCRAT AGAIN,
AT LEAST NOT ONE THAT SEEKS
PUBLIC OFFICE.
>> BUT MALONE SAYS CAHILL IS
ALSO TAP IG INTO A TRADITION
OF IMPORTANT FOR SOCIALLY
LIBERAL BUT ECONOMICALLY
CONSERVATIVE GOVERNORS, LIKE
MITT ROMNEY AND BILL WELD.
>> THE INCREASE IN THE SALES
TAX AT A TIME WHEN FAMILIES,
INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESS PEOPLE
ARE ALL TRYING TO TIGHTEN
THEIR BELTS AND GOVERNMENT IS
SAYING HEY WE'RE TAKING MORE
MONEY OUT OF YOUR POCKET, THAT
IS GOING TO BE ONE OF THOSE
SITUATIONS THAT FELSERS
BETWEEN NOW AND ELECTION DAY.
I THINK IT WILL HURT GOVERNOR.
>> PATRICK SAYS HE DOESN'T
BELIEVE CAHILL WILL BE ABLE TO
PIN THE CLASSIC TAX AND SPEND
LABEL ON HIS OLD PARTY OF
>> IF HE'S GOING TO BE A
CANDIDATE, THEN FINE, WE'LL
TALK ABOUT ALL THAT IN THE
COURSE OF THE CAMPAIGN.
>> THE ELECTION IS STILL 16
MONTHS AWAY.
BUT IT'S ALREADY GAME ON.
ALL RIGHT.
STATE TREASURER TIM OKAY HI IS
HERE.
WELCOME.
>> THANK YOU.
THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME.
>> SO A COUPLE MONTHS AGO I
ASKED YOU ABOUT WHETHER YOU
MIGHT BE LEAVING THE
DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND YOU SAID
I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT IT, MY
PEOPLE AREN'T TALKING ABOUT IT,
AND UNLESS THE PARTY DISOWNS
ME OR THROWS ME OUT I'M A
DEMOCRAT.
WHAT'S CHANGED?
>> I THINK THE FISCAL
SITUATION IN THE STATE AND IN
TERMS OF MY POSITION WITHIN
THAT, THE DECISION HAS BEEN
MADE OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS
ABOUT REALLY DEBATE BETWEEN
WHICH TAXES WE RAISE AS
OPPOSED TO WHETHER OR NOT WE
SHOULD OR SHOULDN'T RAISE
TAXES.
AND I WAS TAKEN ABACK BY SOME
OF THE GOVERNOR'S STATEMENTS
THE DAY HE SIGNED THE TAX
INCREASE TO SIGN THE BUDGET,
BUT SAYING THAT HE BELIEVES WE
SHOULD BE RAISING GAS TAX
EXCESS MAYBE A GRADUATED
INCOME TAX.
IN THE SECOND TERM.
SO ALTHOUGH I HAVEN'T
OFFICIALLY DECIDED IF I'M
GOING TO RUN YET, AND I WON'T
DO THAT UNTIL AFTER LABOR DAY,
I FELT THAT THERE WAS JUST
VERY LITTLE ROOM FOR ME WITHIN
THE PARTY AS A FISCAL
CONSERVATIVE.
AND I'VE SPENT THE LAST AT
LEAST 18 MONTHS TRYING TO MAKE
CHANGES AND HAVE A CHOICE FROM
WITHIN THE PARTY.
I'M NOT AS SUCCESSFUL AS I
WISH I HAD BEEN AND NOW I'LL
TRY TO MAKE CHANGE TONS
OUTSIDE OF THE PARTY.
I THINK THAT WILL HOPEFULLY BE
HEARD AND PROBABLY LEAD ME TO
A DECISION AFTER LABOR DAY AS
TO WHETHER OR NOT I CAN RUN A
CREDIBLE CAMPAIGN FOR
GOVERNOR.
>> BUT YOU'VE ALSO HAD A
HISTORY OF BAD BLOOD HERE WITH,
AND YOU'RE WORK --
WHAT IS THAT ALL ABOUT?
>> I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY.
I JUST HAVEN'T TOWED THE LINE
I GUESS.
I HAVEN'T MAYBE MADE ENOUGH
FRIENDS WITHIN THE PARTY, CUT
ENOUGH DEALS.
>> DO YOU REFUSE TO IMPORTANT
EITHER HILLARY CLINTON OR
BARACK OBAMA OR ENDORSE EITHER
ONE OF THEM.
WAS THAT SEEN AS A REJECT
SHUN?
>> I DON'T KNOW, THAT WAS MORE
OF A CONVENIENT EXCUSE.
I THINK THE PARTY INSIDERS
WERE TRYING TO SENT ME A
MESSAGE, BECAUSE I WAS
CRITICIZING THE GOVERNOR AT
THIS POINT IN TERMS OF THE
FISCAL POLICIES.
AND I THINK THAT WAS SORT OF A
SUBTLE MESSAGE.
BUT WE TOOK IT, I TOOK IT AS A
WAKEUP CALL.
AND I'M NOT COMPLAINING ABOUT
IT OR WHINING ABOUT WHAT
HAPPENED, BUT IT WAS A REALITY
CHECK FOR ME.
AND THEN I HAD TO THINK ABOUT
WHAT CHANCE WOULD I HAVE IN A
CONVENTION, WHERE YOU ARE TO
GET 15%.
AND HOW MUCH TIME WOULD I HAVE
TO PEN DOING THAT AND HOW MANY
DEALS WOULD I HAVE TO MAKE, TO
GET THAT 15%.
AND I'M NOT JUST WILLING TO
MAKE THOSE KIND OF CONCESSIONS,
AND I REALLY FEEL THAT THE
ONLY WAY TO GET THE MESSAGE
ACROSS THAT WE NEED TO HAVE AN
ALTERNATIVE TO THE TAX AND
SPEND POLICIES OF DEMOCRATS AS
A WHOLE IS TO STEP OUTSIDE THE
PARTY.
>> BUT YOU KNOW THAT NO ONE
HAS EVER RUN UNENROLLED OR
INDEPENDENT WON A STATEWIDE
OFFICE.
I GUESS WHAT I'M TRYING TO GET
AT HERE IS JUST MORE
IDEOLOGICALLY MOTTI RATED OR
POLITICALLY.
NOW YOU'VE POSITIONED YOURSELF
SO YOU CAN HAVE AN INDEPENDENT
RUN.
YOU DON'T NEED THE PARTY,
ALTHOUGH YOU'RE ALSO TURNING
YOUR BACK ON THEM, AND THE
DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS STILL THE
POWER HOUSE IN THE STATE.
>> YES, IT'S PROBABLY A
COMBINATION OF THE TWO.
I HAVEN'T THOUGHT IT OUT.
ALL THAT MUCH IN A SENSE,
BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT I WANT TO
DO OVER THE NEXT TWO MONTHS.
AND --
>> WHY DROP OUT NOW THEN?
>> BECAUSE I THINK IT WAS
IMPORTANT FOR ME TO TELL
PEOPLE WHAT PATH I WANTED TO
MAKE BEFORE I MADE MY
DECISION.
AND TO BE HONEST WITH YOU, I'M
NOT REALLY GOOD AS BEING
INDECISIVE, IT'S NOT MY STYLE.
AND I FELT MYSELF OVER THE
LAST TWO MONTHS OF BEING VERY
INDECISIVE.
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO, HOW
ARE YOU GOING TO DO IT.
AND AS I STARTED THINKING MORE
AND MORE ABOUT THAT, IT BECAME
SORT OF, IT MADE SENSE FOR ME.
TO ME I FEEL MORE HONEST AS AN
INDEPENDENT.
THAT'S SORT OF THE WAY I WAS
BROUGHT UP, THAT'S THE WAY I
STARTED MY CAREER AS A CITY
COUNCILLOR.
THE PARTY IS NOT REALLY A
FACTOR IN TERMS OF GOVERNING,
AND THAT'S SOMETHING I FEEL
MORE COMFORTABLE DOING.
THE LAST SIX YEARS HAVE REALLY
BEEN MORE OF A CHANGE FOR ME,
TRYING TO FIT IN.
WHERE I DON'T FEEL LIKE I FIT
IN.
AND I DO REALLY STRONGLY FEEL
THAT PEOPLE DESERVE A CHOICE
IN NOVEMBER.
SO IF I MAKE THIS DECISION
AROUND, IT WILL BE ABOUT A
NOVEMBER RACE, WHERE PEOPLE
WILL HAVE A CHOICE BETWEEN
THOSE PEOPLE WHO WANT TO PEND
MONEY AND TAX HIGHER IN ORDER
TO TRY TO SOLVE OUR FISCAL
PROBLEMS OR THOSE PEOPLE WHO
HAVE ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS FOR
THAT.
AND IT'S A COMBINATION OF
EVERYTHING, IT'S NOT
POLITICALLY CALCULATED BECAUSE
OBVIOUSLY IT HAS NEVER BEEN
DONE BEFORE.
BUT I DO LIKE A CHALLENGE.
>> HAVE YOU ALREADY MADE THE
MOVE?
HAVE YOU TAKEN YOUR NAME OFF
THE --
>> I'LL BE DOING THAT OVER THE
NEXT COUPLE DAYS, AT LEAST BY
FRIDAY.
IT'S JUST MORE OF GETTING TIME
TO GO TO QUINCY CITY HALL AND
MAKING THE PHYSICAL CHANGE AND
SIGNING THE PAPERWORK.
IT'S PRETTY SIMPLE AND I WILL
DEFINITELY HAVE THAT DONE BY
FRIDAY.
>> THIS IS A REAL TRIP WIRE,
BECAUSE IT SETS OFF A CHAIN
REACTION, ALREADY STEVE GROSS
MAN WHO RAN FOR GOVERNOR HAS
SAID HE'S IN IT FOR TREASURER.
SO IF YOU DON'T REDECLARE THAT
YOU WANT TO RUN FOR THAT
OFFICE, THERE WILL BE A WHOLE
BUNCH OF PEOPLE.
I GOT A COUPLE E-MAILS FROM
PEOPLE SAYING THEY WERE GOING
TO JUNE INTO THE TREASURER'S
RACE.
WHY DON'T YOU MAKE A CLEAN --
>> BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO BE
A SPOILER.
IF THAT'S ALL I CAN SEE MYSELF
BEING IS A SPOILER, SORE OF AN
AFTER THOUGHT, THEN I MIGHT
CHOOSE NOT TO DO IT AT THE
END.
IF I CAN'T --
I HAVE TO CONVINCE MYSELF THAT
IT'S DOABLE.
IT'S NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE.
WHAT'S THE PATH, HOW ARE YOU
GOING TO PUT PEOPLE TOGETHER.
WILL PEOPLE CONTRIBUTE TO A
CAMPAIGN OF SOMEONE WHO IS AN
INDEPENDENT.
I DON'T KNOW ANY OF THAT
BECAUSE I'VE NEVER BEEN THERE.
I WANT TO MAKE SURE I HAVE A
CREDIBLE CHANCE OF BEING MORE
THAN AN AFTER THOUGHT OR A
SPOILER.
I WOULDN'T BE MAKING THIS STEP
IF I DIDN'T THINK I COULD PUT
THAT TOGETHER.
BUT UNTIL I FEEL MORE
COMFORTABLE ABOUT WHAT MY
OPTIONS ARE AND WHAT MY
CHANCES ARE AND SORT OF THE
WAY I'LL DO IT, I FEEL IT
WOULD BE, IT'S WISE FOR ME TO
MAKE THIS DECISION BECAUSE
IT'S JUST THE WAY I ALWAYS
MAKE DECISIONS, NOT RASH.
I WANT TO KNOW HOW I'M GOING
TO PAY FOR IT, HOW I'M GOING
TO GET THE MESSAGE ACROSS.
I THINK WE SHOULD KNOW HOW
WE'RE GOING TO PAY FOR
SOMETHING BEFORE WE PROMOTE IT
AND MAKE LEGISLATIVE CHANGES,
AND I'M SEEING LESS OF THAT.
SO I WANT TO BE TRUE TO MYSELF
TO MAKE SURE IT'S A PLAN.
I MAY END UP BRINGING ON MORE
CHALLENGE TOLLS MYSELF IF I
DECIDE NOT TO DO IT.
I THINK THIS IS A STEP THAT
PUTS ME MORE IN LINE WITH
RUNNING, I'M JUST NOT READY TO
TAKE THAT LEAP YET UNTIL I'VE
LINED THINGS UP A LITTLE MORE.
>> YOU HAVE A LOT OF
CHALLENGERS HERE.
DOUG RUBIN IS NOW RUNNING THE
PATRICK CAMPAIGN.
YOU'VE GOT WALSH THAT RAN
PATRICK'S CAMPAIGN, I CAN'T
REMEMBER WHAT HIS TERM WAS --
KILL ME.
>> OUT FOR BLOOD.
AND THE GOVERNOR SAYING YOU
BETTER BRING YOUR A GAME.
THIS IS SERIOUS STUFF.
>> YES.
AND HONESTLY I'VE BEEN VERY
NERVOUS OVER THE LAST WEEK AS
I WAS FORMULATING THIS
DECISION.
TALKED ABOUT IT WITH MY WIFE.
AND FELT COMFORTABLE WITH IT.
BUT IT WASN'T UNTIL YESTERDAY
AND TODAY THEY FELT TOTALLY AT
EASE, AND CONFIDENT THAT I HAD
MADE THE RIGHT MOVE.
I SLEPT REALLY WELL LAST NIGHT,
WHICH SURPRISED ME, BECAUSE I
KNEW WHAT KIND OF A DAY I'D
HAVE TODAY.
SO I'VE ALWAYS BROUGHT MY
A-GAME.
NO ONE HAS EVER OPENED ANY
DOORS FOR ME FROM THE FIRST
RACE UNTIL THE LAST RACE I
RAN.
NOBODY REALLY WANTED ME TO WIN
THAT TREASURER'S SEAT.
I HAD TO DO IT --
I'VE ALWAYS HAD TO DO IT THAT
WAY.
IT'S JUST MY NATURE.
I JOKED TO SOME OF MY PEOPLE
WHEN WE WOULD NEVER WANT AN
EASY RACE, AND THEY ALL
LAUGHED AND SAID YES WE WOULD.
BUT IT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU
WANT BADLY ENOUGH AND YOU'LL
MAKE SACRIFICES FOR.
AT THE END OF THE DAY IF
YOU'RE SUCCESSFUL IT MEANS FOR
TO YOU AND YOU'LL FIGHT HARDER
TO KEEP IT.
THAT'S WHAT I'M LOOKING AT.
I KNOW THE ROAD WOULD BE HARD.
IT WOULD BE EQUALLY HARD TO
RUN AGAINST AN INCUMBENT
GOVERNOR IN MY PARTY. SO
THERE'S NO EASY PATH FOR ME.
BUT I'M NOT CONTENT FOR
SOMEONE, THE WAIT FOR SOMEONE
TO RESIGN OFFICE OR THE DOOR
TO BE OPENED FOR ME.
I FEEL IN THIS ENVIRONMENT WE
NEED LEADERSHIP.
OTHERWISE WE'RE GOING TO FLOAT
FOR THE NEXT COUPLE YEARS IN A
BAD ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT.
>> YOU DESCRIBE YOURSELF AS
FISCALLY CONSERVATIVE.
WHAT WOULD YOU DO DIFFERENTLY
FROM GOVERNOR PATRICK?
YOU SAID YOU'RE IN SUPPORT OF
CASINOS, WHICH COULD IMPACT
THE STATE LOTTERY.
WHAT WOULD YOU DO DIFFERENTLY,
GIVEN THE STATE'S FISCAL
ENVIRONMENT, OTHER THAN
CASINOS.
WHAT WOULD YOU DO?
>> WELL, I WOULDN'T HAVE
SUPPORTED A TAX INCREASE AND
WOULD HAVE FOUGHT HARD AGAINST
ANY TAX INCREASE.
AND WE WOULD HAVE, I WOULD
HAVE HAD A PROPOSED CUTS IN
LOCAL AID, I WOULD HAVE HAD
PROPOSED CUTS PROBABLY IN
HEALTH CARE.
IN THIS ENVIRONMENT, AND I'VE
SAID THIS BEFORE, I DON'T KNOW
IF WE CAN AFFORD THE HERE
EVERY CITIZEN OF THE STATE.
IT'S A GREAT IDEA, I SUPPORT
THE THEORY BEHIND AND IT THE
IDEA.
BUT YOU GOTTA HAVE THE MONEY
TO PAY FOR IT.
I DON'T WANT TO BANKRUPT EVERY
MIDDLE CLASS TAX PAYER IN THE
STATE IN ORDER TO COVER EVERY
INDIVIDUAL.
EDUCATION IS ANOTHER AREA.
THERE'S THREE BIG AREAS IN
STATE GOVERNMENT THAT HAVE TO
BE CUT, BUT ALSO LOOKING AT
SOME OF THE STATE PAYROLL.
OUR PAYROLL IS A HIGHER COST
FOR US TODAY THAN IT WAS IN
2006.
YET WE'VE GOT $3 BILLION LESS
IN REVENUE.
SO I'M NOT SAYING IT'S EASY.
AND THAT'S KIND OF THE WAY I
LOOK AT CAMPAIGNING, IF IT'S
EASY THEN YOU'RE NOT FULLRY
PREPARED TO DO THE TOUGH
THINGS YOU HAVE TO DO WHEN
YOU'RE ELECTED.
SO IF IT'S A TOUGH RACE AND
I'M SUCCESSFUL I THINK THAT
WILL PREPARE ME BETTER FOR
WHAT I THINK WILL BE A VERY
TOUGH ROAD IN 2011, TO TRY TO
STRAIGHT TEN STATE AND GET IT
BACK ON ITS FEET.
>> ALL RIGHT, STATE TREASURER
TIM CAHILL, PRESSURE --
PLEASURE TO HAVE YOU.
>> THANK YOU, EMILY.