>> Emily: GOOD EVENING.
IT BEGAN WHEN A WHITE WOMAN
LOOKED AT HARVARD PROFESSOR
HENRY LOUIS GATES YES OR NO AND
HIS DRIVER AND SAW TWO BLACK
BURGLARS.
THEN THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN
SCHOLAR LOOKED AT A WHITE POLICE
OFFICER AND SAW A RACIST.
THEN THE COP LOOKED AT A BLACK
MAN'S ANGER AND SAW DISORDERLY
CONDUCT.
NOW, THE CRIMINAL CHARGES
AGAINST GATES HAVE BEEN DROPPED,
BUT PAINFUL QUESTIONS ABOUT RACE
AND PERCEPTION IN AMERICA
REMAIN.
CAMBRIDGE POLICE SPOKESWOMAN
KELLY DOWNS SAYS LAST WEEK'S
ARREST OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY
PROFESSOR HENRY LOUIS GATES IS
SOMETHING BOTH THE DEPARTMENT
AND GATES WISH THEY COULD SIMPLY
FORGET.
>> HINDSIGHT BEING WHAT IT IS, I
THINK EVERYONE VIEWS THIS
INCIDENT AS ONE WE WISH HAD NOT
OCCURRED.
>> Emily: WHEN GATES ARRIVED
HOME FROM A CHINA TRIP LAST
THURSDAY, HE AND HIS DRIVER
TRIED TO PUSH OPEN A STUCK FRONT
DOOR.
THINKING IT WAS A BREAK-IN, A
WOMAN WHO WORKED NEARBY CALLED
POLICE.
GATES WAS INSIDE BY THE TIME
CAMBRIDGE POLICE SERGEANT JAMES
CROWLEY ARRIVED, BUT THAT'S
WHERE THE ACCOUNTS DIFFER.
CROWLEY SAYS GATES WAS ABUSIVE,
AT FIRST REFUSING TO SHOW I.D.
AND THEN ASKING, "WHY?
BECAUSE I'M A BLACK MAN IN
AMERICA"?
GATES SAID HE SHOWED I.D. AND
THAT IT WAS CROWLEY WHO REFUSED
TO IDENTIFY HIMSELF.
>> IT WAS NOT PROFESSOR GATES'S
BEST MOMENT AND IT CERTAINLY WAS
NOT THE CAMBRIDGE POLICE
DEPARTMENT'S BEST MOMENT.
>> Emily: OFFICER CROWLEY
REPORTS GATES FOLLOWED HIM
OUTSIDE SHOUTING HE WAS A
RACIST.
GATES WAS HANDCUFFED AND SPENT
FOUR HOURS IN CUSTODY.
>> YOU HAD TWO HUMAN BEINGS THAT
WERE REACTING TO A SET OF
CIRCUMSTANCES AND UNFORTUNATELY
AT THE TIME COOLER HEADS DID NOT
PREVAIL.
>> Emily: TODAY A JOINT
STATEMENT FROM THE POLICE AND
GATES'S LAWYERS CALL THE
DISMISSAL OF CHARGES A JUST
RESOLUTION TO AN UNFORTUNATE SET
OF CIRCUMSTANCES.
>> AFTER LOOKING AT THE FACTS
AND CIRCUMSTANCES, ALL OF US
HAVE COME TO THE DECISION THAT
THE BEST THING TO DO IS SIMPLE
GET PAST THIS AT THIS POINT.
>> Emily: IF ONLY IT WERE THAT
SIMPLE.
ALL RIGHT.
WITH ME NOW ARE OFFICER BILL
WILLIS OF THE BOSTON POLICE
DEPARTMENT, HARVARD SOCIOLOGY
PROFESSOR ORLANDO PATTERSON WHO
IS ALSO A FRIEND OF HENRY GATES,
ATTORNEY HARVEY SILVERGLATE AND
TELEVISION COMMENTATOR CALLIE
CROSSLEY.
I'M GOING TO START WITH YOU,
HARVEY, BECAUSE I THINK ONE OF
THE THINGS YOUR FELLOW PANELISTS
ARE PROBABLY GOING TO AGREE UPON
IS THIS LIKELY COULD NOT HAVE
HAPPENED TO YOU.
AGREE?
>> WOULD LIKE NOT HAVE HAPPENED
TO ME?
>> Emily: COULD NOT HAVE
HAPPENED TO YOU.
>> I THINK IT DEPENDS WHETHER I
GAVE THE OFFICER LIP.
I HAD A CASE ONCE WHERE I WALKED
ON A SEARCH AND IT WAS CAMBRIDGE
POLICE DETECTIVE POINTED THE
REVOLVER AT MY RIGHT TEMPLE,
I'LL NEVER FORGET IT, I SAID
"WHAT ARE HAVE I DONE?"
HE SAID "YOU'RE ASSAULTING ME
WITH THAT PEN.
STOP TAKING NOTES.
>> Emily: NO ONE WOULD HAVE
CALLED THE POLICE TO BEGIN WITH.
>> THAT'S TRUE.
IF I WAS TRYING TO FORCE THE
DOOR OPEN, I DOUBT SOMEBODY
WOULD HAVE CALLED.
>> Emily: YOU'RE A POLICE
OFFICER IN BOSTON, NOT FAMILIAR
WITH THIS CASE BUT OBVIOUSLY YOU
HAVE HAD INCIDENTS LIKE THIS
THAT YOU HAVE HAD TO DEAL WITH.
ACCORDING TO THE POLICE REPORT,
THE FIRST THING THAT HENRY LOUIS
GATES JR. SAID TO THE OFFICER
WHEN HE SAID, "CAN I SEE YOUR
I.D.?"
HE SAID, "WHY?
BECAUSE I'M A BLACK MAN?"
IT'S PROVOCATIVE AND IT'S A
PUSH-BACK, BUT IS THAT CAUSE FOR
-- IS THAT AN AGITATED RESPONSE?
>> WELL, I THINK IT WAS AN
OVERREACTION BUT I THINK IN THAT
SITUATION MAYBE YOU HAVE TO LOOK
AT MAYBE THERE WERE BREAK-INS IN
THE AREA BEFORE, WE DON'T KNOW
ALL THE INFORMATION THE OFFICER
HAD BEFORE HE RESPONDED THERE SO
I THINK WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THE
TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES --
>> Emily: IT WAS A COLD CALL.
HE DRIVES UP.
THE WOMAN IS STILL STANDING
THERE.
HE IDENTIFIES HIMSELF.
DIDN'T WANT TO TURN HIS BACK TO
THE HOUSE, HE SAID "I'M GOING TO
CALL REINFORCEMENTS," HE TURNS
AND WALKS UP TO THE HOUSE BUT
ONCE HE GETS THE LAY OF THE LAND
HERE -- THE GUY IS INSIDE, HE'S
NOT RANSACKING -- IN FACT, HE'S
ON THE PHONE CALLING THE HARVARD
REAL ESTATE OFFICE TO SAY, "MY
FRONT DOOR DOESN'T WORK."
THERE WERE CIRCUMSTANCES THERE
THAT PROBABLY COULD HAVE BEEN
SORTED OUT ON THE SPOT.
IS IT AN OFFICER'S OBLIGATION TO
PURSUE EVEN A SUSPICION OF A
BREAKIN IF IT BECOMES APPARENT
INSTANTANEOUSLY THAT THAT'S NOT
THE CASE?
>> NO, PROBABLY NOT BUT I THINK
IT'S DIFFICULT TO SCRUTINIZE
SOMEBODY IF YOU WEREN'T THERE.
IF I HAD A TV CAMERA FOLLOWING
ME AROUND FOR EVERY SITUATION
THAT I GOT INTO AS A POLICE
OFFICER, IT WOULD BE VERY
DIFFICULT FOR ME TO DO MY JOB
AND I THINK IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT
IT FROM THE OTHER SIDE IT'S EASY
TO PLAY THE MONDAY-MORNING
QUARTERBACK AND SAY THEY SHOULD
HAVE REACTED THIS WAY OR THAT
WAY, AND I THINK IT MAKES IT
DIFFICULT FOR US TO BE EFFECTIVE
POLICE OFFICERS IF THAT WERE TO
HAPPEN.
SO I THINK WE HAVE TO NOT VILIFY
THIS PERSON FOR THIS ONE
PARTICULAR INCIDENT --
>> Emily: THE POLICE OFFICER.
>> YES.
IF THERE IS A PATTERN OF
BEHAVIOR THAT EXHIBITS RACIST
BEHAVIOR, THAT'S DIFFERENT.
>> Emily: APPARENTLY THERE IS
NONE IN THIS OFFICER'S CASE THAT
HAS BEEN CHECKED OUT.
ORLANDO, YOU'RE A FRIEND OF
HENRY LOUIS GATES AND I THINK
IT'S FAIR -- HE'S KNOWN AS
HAVING SOMETHING OF A PRICKLY
PERSONALITY -- HE CAN BE
DIFFICULT AT TIMES.
WOULD THIS KIND OF SITUATION
HAVE BEEN -- WOULD THIS HAVE PUT
HIM OVER THE TOP?
>> NO, I DON'T KNOW HIM AS A
VERY PRICKLY PERSON, BUT THE
SITUATION I CAN WELL IMAGINE
MYSELF IN AND I WOULD BE
ANNOYED.
THE QUESTION IS WHETHER YOU HAVE
A RIGHT TO YELL AT AN OFFICER
FROM WITHIN YOUR HOUSE.
HE WASN'T YELLING CURSE WORDS
AND SO ON.
>> Emily: YES.
>> AND I AM OUTRAGED.
I THINK THAT THE POLICE OFFICER
CAN ARREST YOU ON WHAT SEEMS
LIKE -- IT LOOKS LIKE A
TRUMPED-UP CHARGE.
THE IMPORTANT THING TO REMEMBER
WITH RESPECT TO WHAT THE OFFICER
JUST SAID IS THAT THE CHARGE --
THE MAIN REASON FOR THE TURNING
UP, HE QUICKLY ASSURRENDER WAS
NOT THE CASE.
HE SHOWED HIM HIS I.D., HE
FIGURED THAT THE OFFICER
REALIZED THAT HE WAS -- THIS WAS
THE MAN IN HIS HOME, IN WHICH
CASE DO YOU HAVE REALLY A
REASONABLE CLAIM TO ARREST
SOMEONE BECAUSE HE GOT ANNOYED
WHEN YOU, THE OFFICER, REFUSE TO
GIVE YOUR BADGE NUMBER AND YOUR
NAME?
I READ THE POLICE REPORT.
AND THIS WAS RATHER GARBLED AND
UNBELIEVABLE.
HE SAID THAT HE KEPT ASKING
THREE TIMES WHAT HIS NAME AND
BADGE NUMBER WAS AND HE CLAIMS
THAT HE TOLD HIM AND WAS YELLING
IT.
I DON'T THINK THAT'S TRUE.
>> Emily: HE SAID HE WAS SO
AGITATED HE DIDN'T HEAR WHAT HE
WAS SAYING.
>> FROM MY EXPERIENCE, I THINK
WHAT THIS IS IS A REAL
INTERSECTION OF CLASS AND RACE
HERE.
MY SENSE IS THAT IF THIS HAD
HAPPENED IN A WORKING-CLASS
NEIGHBORHOOD OR ANOTHER AREA AND
THE POLICE CAME, OK, THIS IS THE
GUY'S HOME, HE WOULDN'T GET TOO
PEAS IN A POD WHAT THE GUY WAS
SAYING.
MY SENSE IS THAT THERE IS SOME
RESENTMENT OF MIDDLE-CLASS
BLACKS ESPECIALLY BY
WORKING-CLASS WHITE PEOPLE AND
THERE IS A LITTLE SENSE OF,
"WHAT ARE YOU DOING IN THIS
HOUSE?"
>> Emily: THIS GUY WAS SO
ADAMANT HE DIDN'T KNOW WHO HENRY
LOUIS GATES WAS.
>> IT DIDN'T MATTER WHO GATES
WAS.
THIS IS AN UPPER-MIDDLE-CLASS
PART OF CAMBRIDGE, AND IF THIS
IS A WHITE PERSON THE OFFICER,
IF HE HAD A BRAIN IN HIS HEAD
WOULD THINK, "WELL, THE GUY
SHOWED ME HIS I.D., HE LIVES
HERE, HE'S OBVIOUSLY -- BELONGS
TO THIS NEIGHBORHOOD AND HE
WOULD -- WELL, YOU KNOW, "I WAS
JUST DOING MY JOB, SORRY," AND
LEAVE IT AT THAT.
THE FACT THAT HE PERSISTED AND
HAD THIS CRAVEEN, MEDIEVAL
CHARGE OF BEHAVING IN A
TUMULTUOUS MANNER.
>> Emily: THAT'S A PHRASE THAT
DOESN'T APPLY.
>> IT'S ABSURD AND I THINK THERE
IS SOME SENSE OF "WHAT ARE YOU
DOING LIVING HERE?"
>> Emily: CALLIE, TODAY HENRY
LOUIS GATES SAID HE DID NOT USE
THE WORD RACIST, HE CLAIMS HE
DID NOT YELL AT THE POLICE
OFFICER, HE HAS A NASAL
INFECTION, HE DID NOT YELL AND
DIDN'T USE THE TERM "YOU'RE A
RACIST."
LET'S SAY HE HAD.
WOULD THAT HAVE BEEN A FAIR
CHARGE?
>> I GUESS I WANT TO GO TO A
GLOBAL LOOK AT THIS, WHEN YOU
HAVE A SITUATION AS MY FRIENDS
PUT IT TODAY THAT YOU ARE BEING
SUSPECTED BASED ON SOME
STEREOTYPE, YOU'RE IN YOUR OWN
HOME AND IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN
CHALLENGED ON YOUR CREDENTIALS
IN THE STORE, IN THE GROCERY
STORE, ON THE STREET, ON YOUR
JOB, FOR YOUR LIFE, YOU HAVEN'T
BEEN BLACK IN AMERICA SO YOU'RE
IN YOUR HOUSE AND YOU KNOW WHO
YOU ARE AND YOU HAVE I.D. AND
YOU ARE BEING QUESTIONED ABOUT
THAT?
THAT CAN SEND YOU TO A RAGE YOU
CAN'T EVEN IMAGINE FOR SOMEONE
WHO HAS NOT HAD TO EXPERIENCE
THAT -- I HAVE BEEN READING THE
COMMENTS ON THE STORIES AND I
THINK IT'S INTERESTING.
A LOT OF PEOPLE SAY, "LISTEN, I
WAS AT A HOUSE AND THE POLICE
CAME AND I WASN'T -- THEY DIDN'T
KNOW IF IT WAS MY HOUSE AND I
SHOWED THEM MY I.D., THAT WAS
THE END OF THE STORY."
THAT WAS ONE TIME IN YOUR LIFE.
YOU HAVE NOT BEEN QUESTIONED ON
TUESDAY ABOUT WHETHER YOU HAVE
THE RIGHT TO BE IN THIS PLACE,
YOU HAVE NOT BEEN QUESTIONED ON
SATURDAY ABOUT WHO YOU ARE AND
WHAT YOUR CREDENTIALS MEAN, AND
THAT IS THE RICH, UNFORTUNATE
HISTORY FROM WHICH HIS RESPONSE
SPRANG, AND SO IT PUT THEM BOTH
IN A HISTORICAL MOMENT BECAUSE
THIS IS THE PATTERN WE HAVE
SEEN.
I AM THE AUNT OF A 17-YEAR-OLD
BLACK YOUNG MAN AND PART OF THE
RITUAL IS TO TRAIN THEM AS MY
SISTER HAS HAD TO DO HOW TO
INTERACT WITH COPS.
THAT'S JUST UNDERSTOOD.
IT'S NOT SOMETHING YOU CAN GET
AWAY WITH, BECAUSE OFTEN --
>> Emily: GIVING LIP?
>> NO, THE SITUATION IS THAT IT
CAN EASILY ESCALATE SO THAT'S
WHY I'M SAYING THIS IS SUCH --
THIS IS SO REAL IN OUR LIVES, I
CAN'T TELL YOU HOW MUCH I RESENT
THIS RACE-CARD BUSINESS BEING
THROWN OUT.
THIS IS NOT A GAME.
THIS IS PEOPLE'S LIVES.
WE CAN SAY THAT MAYBE BOTH OF
THEM, AS SHE SAID, I THINK THE
OFFICER -- THE SPOKESPERSON SAID
IT WASN'T THE BEST MOMENT FOR
EITHER ONE OF THEM AND WE CAN
UNDERSTAND THAT BUT IT COMES
FROM SOMEPLACE.
>> Emily: THIS IS AN EXCELLENT
QUESTION.
I REALLY WANT TO GET AT THIS
WITH BILL WILLIS, TOO, BECAUSE
WHAT ABOUT GIVING LIP?
I KNOW QUITE FRANKLY, THIS
HAPPENED TO ME ONCE, I GAVE LIP
TO A GUY WHO STOPPED ME FOR
TURNING LEFT SOMEWHERE I WASN'T
SUPPOSED TO, I GAVE HIM LIP AND
HE GAVE ME A $100 TICKET, BANG,
BUT HE DIDN'T ARREST ME, HE
DIDN'T DRAG ME OUT OF THE CAR
AND PUT ME IN HANDCUFFS.
WHAT'S WRONG WITH GIVING LIP?
IT'S NOT NICE AND IT'S RUDE, BUT
IS IT ILLEGAL?
>> FREE COUNTRY.
>> Emily: YEAH.
IS IT ILLEGAL?
>> IT'S NOT ILLEGAL BUT I THINK
WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH THINGS ON
THE STREET IN A MANNER IN WHICH
WE HAVE TO BE CONSCIOUS OF WHO
WE'RE DEALING WITH BUT ALSO THAT
THERE ARE SO MANY THINGS THAT WE
HAVE TO DEAL WITH AS POLICE
OFFICERS, SO IF WE'RE DEALING
WITH THE MESSY, NASTY STUFF, IT
DOESN'T ALLOW US TO DEAL WITH
THE REAL PROBLEMS THAT ARE OUT
THERE ON THE STREET AND IF WE
HAVE TO TEACH OUR YOUNG KIDS,
OUR YOUNG BLACK MEN HAVE TO DEAL
-- HOW TO DEAL WITH THE POLICE,
I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH
THAT.
IF THEY CAN ESCALATE A
SITUATION, WHY CAN'T WE TEACH
OUR KIDS TO DEESCALATE THE
SITUATION?
I DON'T THINK THERE IS A PROBLEM
WITH THAT.
>> Emily: WE'RE TALKING ABOUT
THE LEGALITIES OF THIS.
>> THIS IS NOT ABOUT THE STREET.
>> Emily: IT'S A MAN'S HOME.
IS IT ILLEGAL -- EVEN IF HE HAD
USED EXPLETIVES, IS IT ILLEGAL
TO DO THAT TO A POLICE OFFICER?
>> NO, IT'S NOT AND THAT'S WHY I
SAY HE MAY HAVE USED POOR
JUDGMENT, I UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT
I THINK PEOPLE DON'T REALLY
UNDERSTAND THAT WE'RE HUMANS,
WE'RE NOT ROBOTS, WE'RE NOT
ROBOCOPS, WE DON'T KNOW IF THIS
GUY COULD HAVE BEEN HAVING
MARITAL PROBLEMS, IF MAYBE HE
HAS A SICK CHILD OR SOMETHING
LIKE THAT.
>> Emily: THE COP?
COME ON.
>> ALL THAT STUFF BUT IT GOES
INTO YOUR EMOTIONS AND HOW
YOU'RE GOING TO HANDLE A CERTAIN
SITUATION.
YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HANDLE EVERY
SITUATION BY THE BOOK, HOW IT
WAS DRAWN UP -- THERE IS NO
MANUAL THAT SAYS YOU SHOULD
HANDLE EVERY SITUATION THIS
PARTICULAR WAY.
WE ALL GO THROUGH THOSE
SITUATIONS IN OUR JOB, BUT
BECAUSE WE'RE POLICE OFFICERS
WE'RE SCRUTINIZED MORE THAN THE
PUBLIC
>>, AND WE SHOULD BE HELD TO A
HIGHER STANDARD, I AGREE WITH
THAT, BUT THEN ALSO, LET US DO
OUR JOB BECAUSE WE'RE OUT THERE
DOING A GOOD JOB.
MOST PEOPLE DON'T LIKE US.
EVEN IN OUR OWN NEIGHBORHOOD.
>> Emily: OF COURSE.
ONE OF THE THINGS THAT CAME UP
TODAY, AND TALK ABOUT
STEREOTYPES, IT WAS CAMBRIDGE.
PEOPLE WERE SURPRISED THAT THIS
HAPPENED IN CAMBRIDGE BECAUSE IT
IS THE LIBERAL BASTION OF THE
UNITED STATES, FOR HEAVEN SAKES
AND ALSO IN A NEIGHBORHOOD RIGHT
NEAR HARVARD UNIVERSITY THAT'S
KNOWN TO BE -- IT'S NOT TOTALLY
DIVERSE, BUT IT'S DIVERSE
ENOUGH, AND THAT YOU SEE EVERY
KIND OF HUMAN BEING ON THE
HARVARD CAMPUS THESE DAYS, THAT
THE COPS THERE WOULDN'T HAVE
ANTICIPATED OR EXPECTED TO SEE
AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN IN A HOUSE.
IS THAT CRAZY?
TO THINK THAT?
>> I HAVE TO SAY THE CAMBRIDGE
POLICE ARE MORE POLICE THAN THEY
ARE CAMBRIDGE, AND THERE IS A
CERTAIN POLICE CULTURE AND IT'S
FOUND ALL AROUND THE COUNTRY,
NOT ONLY IN THIS COUNTRY, BY THE
WAY -- I WOULDN'T GIVE A FRENCH
POLICE OFFICER LIP EITHER.
IN THIS CASE, I'VE REPRESENTED A
LOT OF PEOPLE, BLACKS AND WHITES
HAVE HAVE BEEN IN CONFRONTATIONS
WITH BLACK POLICE AND WHITE
POLICE AND I'VE CONCLUDED OVER
THE FOUR DECADES HAVE BEEN DOING
THIS THAT BLACK PEOPLE ARE MUCH
MORE LIKELY TO BE STOPPED -- I
THINK THAT THE ORIGINAL -- THE
REPORTING OF PROFESSOR GATES
TRYING TO GET INTO HIS HOUSE AND
THE ORIGINAL CONFRONTATION WITH
THE POLICEMAN WAS REALLY
DETERMINED A LOT BY HIS RACE.
BUT ONCE THERE WAS A DISCOURSE
BETWEEN THE OFFICER AND
PROFESSOR GATES, HE COULD HAVE
BEEN WHITE, HE COULD HAVE BEEN
YELLOW, HE COULD HAVE BEEN
IRISH, HE COULD HAVE BEEN
ANYTHING.
IF HE GAVE THE OFFICER LIP, HE
HAD A GOOD CHANCE OF GETTING
ARRESTED FOR INTERFERING WITH A
POLICE OFFICER OR DISORDERLY
CONDUCT.
ONCE YOU GET INTO THOSE KIND OF
CONFRONTATIONS YOU TAKE GREAT
RISKS REGARDLESS OF YOUR RACE,
BUT THE ORIGINAL CONFRONTATION,
I THINK, WAS PROBABLY
RACE-RELATED BUT NOT THE REST OF
IT.
>> PART OF WHAT BOTHERS ME IS
THAT THIS OFFICER WASN'T ACTING
ALONE.
THERE WERE APPARENTLY SEVERAL
OTHERS WHO WERE OUT THERE --
>> Emily: ACCORDING TO THE
PHOTOGRAPHS THERE WERE AT LEAST
FOUR -- SOME OF THEM HARVARD
POLICE.
>> VERY CONFUSING.
>> WHAT BOTHERS ME, COULDN'T
SOME OTHER OFFICER PROVIDE SOME
--
>> Emily: SORT IT OUT?
>> SAY "THIS MAY NOT BE A GOOD
IDEA"?
>> Emily: CROWLEY HAD ALREADY
MADE THE DETERMINATION BEFORE,
THAT'S HOW I READ THE REPORT.
>> YOU WOULD THINK THAT THE
HARVARD POLICE OFFICER --
>> TO ELABORATE ON WHAT I SAID
ABOUT CAMBRIDGE POLICE, HARVARD
POLICE IS MORE POLICE THAN
HARVARD AS WELL, THE CULTURE OF
THE HARVARD POLICE --
>> Emily: CROWLEY WAS A FORMER
HARVARD POLICE OFFICER.
ALL THE MORE REASON HE SHOULD
HAVE KNOWN WHO GATES WAS.
>> I'VE REPRESENTED MANY
STUDENTS WHO HAVE BEEN HARASSED
BY HARVARD UNIVERSITY POLICE.
THEY HAVE BEEN WHITE AND THEY
HAVE BEEN BLACK AND THEY HAVE
BEEN HARASSED.
>> I THINK THERE IS SOME
RESENTMENT INVOLVED --
>> Emily: GATES HAS ASKED FOR AN
APOLOGY.
DO YOU THINK THAT SHOULD HAPPEN?
>> IT DEPEND ON HOW THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT WANTS TO HANDLE IT.
>> Emily: THEY'VE DONE IT TODAY.
IT'S OVER.
THEY MADE A STATEMENT AND IT
SOUNDS AS THOUGH BOTH PARTIES --
THERE WERE SIGNATURES ON EACH
SIDE, SOUNDED LIKE EVERYBODY
AGREED BUT HE THROUGH THE
NEWSPAPER IS ASKING FOR AN
APOLOGY.
>> FROM THE OFFICER.
>> Emily: RIGHT.
>> I THINK THAT'S UP TO THE
OFFICER.
I HAVE GONE THROUGH A CONFERENCE
ON THIS AND A GOOD APOLOGY IS
ONE IN WHICH YOU REALLY BELIEVE
IT AND YOU WANT TO MAKE SOME
KIND OF RESTITUTION.
>> Emily: I'M ASKING, IS THERE
ONE NECESSARY?
>> I CERTAINLY THINK THE
CAMBRIDGE POLICE SHOULD MAKE
SOME STATEMENT THAT THEY WILL DO
SOMETHING ABOUT NOT HAVING THIS
HAPPEN AGAIN, AND IT MEANS -- I
JUST CAN'T UNDERSTAND HOW -- YOU
KNOW, A POLICE OFFICER COULD
MAKE A MISTAKE LIKE THIS.
IT LOOKS LIKE BAD TRAINING OR
IT'S JUST SORT OF DEEP
RESENTMENT ON THE PART OF THIS
OFFICER.
>> Emily: ARE YOU BUYING THAT?
>> ESPECIALLY, I HADN'T
REALIZED, THIS IS MY FIRST TIME
HEARING THAT HE'S A FORMER
HARVARD POLICE OFFICER BUT HE
HAVE DEFINITELY HAVE KNOWN
BETTER.
WHICH SUGGESTS TO ME THAT THERE
IS SOMETHING ELSE GOING ON.
>> I THINK IT'S MORE ABOUT CLASS
THAN RACE.
IF THIS HAPPENED SOMEWHERE ELSE
IN A DIFFERENT PART OF THE AREA
THAT'S A NONSTORY.
I'M GLAD IT CREATED SOME
DIALOGUE BUT I ALSO WANT SOME
PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE
POLICE OFFICER SHOULDN'T BE
VILIFIED.
IF HE WERE A BLACK OFFICER THIS
WOULD BE A NONSTORY.
>> Emily: HARVEY SILVERGLATE,
BILL WILLIAM'LLIS, ORLANDO
PATTERSON, CALLIE CROSSLEY,
THANKS FOR JOINING US.
PREPARE TO PAY DEEPER TO PAY T
FARES.