>> Emily: TONIGHT ON "GREATER
BOSTON" SPIES AMONG US.
THE PARAPHERNALIA FOUND IN THE
HOME OF THE RUSSIAN SPIES.
AND THE OWNER OF DeLUCA'S HAS
HIS NEWBURY STREET CLOSED.
IT MAY BE A NEW EXHIBIT AT THE
ICA.
Closed Captioning
brought to you by AFLAC:
Ask about it at work.
GOOD EVENING.
IT HAS BEEN A COLD WAR CHAPTER
PLAYED OUT IN THIS HOT SUMMER IN
MASSACHUSETTS.
ANDREY BEZRUKOV AND ELENA
VAVILOVA ARE BACK HOME IN
RUSSIA, BUT THE STORY OF THEIR
MYSTERIOUS LIFE CONTINUED TO
EMERGE.
YESTERDAY IN U.S. DISTRICT
COURT, DOCUMENTS WERE UNSEALED
THAT LISTS THE ITEMS SEIZED FROM
THE PAIR'S TROWBRIDGE STREET
HOME.
SOME OF THE OBJECTS RESEMBLED
PROPS FROM A COLD WAR THRILLER
LIKE A COKE CAN WITH A FAKE
BOTTOM.
STILL IT'S UNCLEAR WHAT THEY
WERE UP TO AS THEY LIVED AS
DONALD HEATH FIELD AND TRACY ANN
FOLEY.
AND JOINING ME IS PETER KRUPP,
WHO REPRESENTED DONALD
HEATHFIELD, ALSO KNOWN AS ANDREY
BEZRUKOV.
I KNOW THERE ARE SOME THINGS YOU
CAN'T TELL ME DUE TO
ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE.
BUT WERE THEY EVER ALLOWED BACK
INTO THE TROWBRIDGE STREET HOME
TO COLLECT PERSONAL ITEMS?
>> NO.
ONCE THEY WERE ARRESTED THEY
WERE TAKEN OUT OF THE HOME.
THERE WAS A SEARCH WARRANT THAT
HAD BEEN AUTHORIZED, AND THE
SEARCH BEGAN BY THE FBI AND
MAYBE OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT
AGENCIES THAT WERE HELPING THE
FBI.
>> Emily: SO ANY PERSONAL ITEMS,
CLOTHING, JEWELRY, COLLECTIBLES,
ARTWORK, ALL OF THAT BECOMES THE
PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT?
>> NO.
AS PART OF THE PLEA DEAL, THEY
AGREED TO FORFEIT CERTAIN
THINGS.
ONE OF WHICH IS THE ACTUAL
STRUCTURE, THE HOUSE.
BUT THE CONTENTS OF THE HOUSE IS
NOT FORFEITED AND ONCE THE
GOVERNMENT HAS REVIEWED IT TO
DETERMINE IF ANY OF THE ITEMS IN
THE HOUSE HAVE ANY EVIDENTIARY
VALUE, THE GOVERNMENT WILL
RETURN THEM TO ME ON THEIR
BEHALF.
>> Emily: AND THEN, I MEAN, DO
YOU SHIP IT -- I'M CURIOUS
ABOUT -- DO THEY WANT THIS STUFF
BACK?
>> I DON'T KNOW IF THEY WANT IT
ALL.
BUT I SUSPECT SOME OF IT.
>> Emily: I CAN'T IMAGINE.
THE ITEMIZED LIST.
>> THE GOVERNMENT HAS DONE THE
ITEMIZED LIST OF EVERYTHING THEY
TOOK OUT OF THE HOUSE.
WHATEVER THEY FEEL IS
NONEVIDENTIARY VALUE WILL BE
RETURNED AND WE'LL GET IT BACK
TO THEM.
>> Emily: IS THERE ANYTHING
SIGNIFICANT IN YOUR MIND, AND I
KNOW THAT YOU REPRESENT ANDREY
ANYWAY, THAT IS OF VALUE TO THE
GOVERNMENT?
>> IT'S HARD FOR ME TO SAY.
I HAVEN'T SEEN ANY OF IT.
I HAVE ONLY SEEN THE LIST OF
WHAT THE ITEMS ARE.
A LOT OF THE ITEMS ARE LISTED AS
MISCELLANEOUS PAPERS AND IT'S
HARD FOR ME TO TELL WHAT THOSE
CONTAIN.
THERE ARE COMPUTERS, THERE'S --
>> Emily: EVERYBODY HAS A
COMPUTER.
>> WHAT ANYBODY WOULD FIND IN
THEIR HOUSE.
BLACKBERRY, MISCELLANEOUS
PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION.
THERE'S CREDIT CARDS, THINGS
LIKE THAT.
>> Emily: BUT THE COMPUTERS
COULD HAVE ENCRYPTED MATERIAL?
YOU HAVE NO IDEA?
>> I HAVE NO IDEA.
I CAN SAY THAT THE GOVERNMENT
OVER THE COURSE OF TEN YEARS
WHILE THEY WERE WATCHING
MR. HEATHFIELD AND MS. FOLEY,
WHILE THEY WERE WATCHING THEM
THEY RECEIVED VARIOUS SEARCH
WARRANTS TO GO INTO THE HOUSE
WHEN THEY WERE ON VACATION OR
WERE AWAY AND THEY WERE
AUTHORIZED TO GO IN, TAKE
PICTURES OF DOCUMENTS, TAKE
COPIES OF DOCUMENTS, PUT THEM
BACK WHERE THEY WERE.
THEY HAD SEARCHES OF SAFE
DEPOSIT BOXES AND LOOKING OVER
THE ENTIRE TEN-YEAR SPAN, THE
GOVERNMENT WAS STILL UNABLE TO
POINT TO ANY SECRET OR ANY
ESPIONAGE OR ANYTHING STOLEN OF
VALUE TO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT --
>> Emily: LIKE TEN YEARS, WELL,
YOUR CLIENTS AWARE THAT THEY
WERE BEING SPIED UPON BY THE
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT?
>> I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO
THAT BUT I'VE GOT TO THINK THE
ANSWER IS NO.
>> Emily: I WOULD THINK THE
ANSWER IS YES.
[ LAUGHTER ]
>> I DON'T KNOW.
FOR SURE.
IT DOES SEEM TO ME THAT AS SOON
AS THEY WERE KNOWN TO THE U.S.
GOVERNMENT TO BE WORKING FOR THE
RUSSIAN FEDERATION, THEY BECAME
AN ASSET OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
THAT COULD BE TRADED AT ANY
TIME.
THEY COULD BE ARRESTED AT ANY
TIME AND SO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
WAS WATCHING THEM.
APPARENTLY SEEMS TO THINK THEY
WERE NOT OF ANY GREAT THREAT
BECAUSE THEY LEFT THEM OUT ON
THE STREET TO CONTINUE TO DO
WHAT THEY WERE DOING.
AND I HAVE YET TO SEE ANY
EVIDENCE SURFACE OR DISCLOSED BY
THE GOVERNMENT THAT INDICATES
THAT THEY HAD ANY SECRETS.
>> Emily: IT WAS -- EITHER YOU
OR YOUR PARTNER, FORGIVE ME, I
CAN'T REMEMBER WHICH ONE, THAT
HAD THE GREAT LINE ON FIRST DAY.
THAT THEY WERE GUILTY OF
INVADING COCKTAIL PARTIES AND
PTA MEETING.
DO YOU STILL BELIEVE THAT?
>> THAT SEEMS TO BE WHAT
HAPPENED.
THE LINE BETWEEN SOMEBODY WHO
IS -- WELL, LET ME BACK UP A
SECOND.
THEY WERE -- HEATHFIELD AND
FOLEY WERE ACCUSED OF BEING AN
AGENT FOR THE RUSSIAN
FEDERATION.
THAT IS TO SAY THEY WERE HERE
AND HAD AGREED TO TAKE CERTAIN
DIRECTION FROM THE RUSSIAN
FEDERATION AND DID IT WITHOUT
REGISTERING.
THEY'RE NOT ACCUSED OF ESPIONAGE
OR A WHOLE HOST OF THINGS THAT
IF THEY WERE REALLY SPIES AS WE
THINK OF THE TERM SPIES, THEY
MIGHT HAVE BEEN ACCUSED OF.
SO I GUESS IT'S FOR THE PUBLIC
TO DECIDE WHAT CONSTITUTES A
SPY, IF YOU'RE GATHERING GENERAL
INFORMATION ABOUT THE UNITED
STATES AND THE WAY -- HOW PEOPLE
THINK AND THE WAY IN WHICH
DECISIONS ARE MADE IN THE UNITED
STATES, GENERAL TOPICS THAT WE
ALL TAKE FOR GRANTED, MAYBE
THAT'S SPYING IN A CERTAIN SENSE
ON THE UNITED STATES.
BUT IT'S A PRETTY INNOCUOUS
VERSION.
MAYBE THERE WAS A GREATER
PURPOSE, MAYBE THEY WERE LOOKING
FOR MORE SECRETS BUT AS FAR AS I
CAN TELL THERE WEREN'T ANY.
>> Emily: THAT MUST HAVE BEEN
LOOK -- THEY MUST HAVE BEEN
LOOKING FOR SOMETHING.
I KNOW YOU SAID OFF CAMERA THAT
YOU'RE NOT COMFORTABLE TALKING
ABOUT THE CHILDREN.
IS THERE ANYTHING YOU CAN TELL
ME THOUGH ABOUT THE PLEA DEAL
THAT INVOLVED -- I MEAN, THEY IT
WAS REPORTED IN THE PRESS SO I
FEEL COMFORTABLE ASKING YOU
THIS, THEY WERE CONCERNED ABOUT
THE WELFARE OF THEIR TWO KIDS,
16 AND 20.
WAS THAT PART OF THE ARRANGEMENT
WHEN THEY NEGOTIATED THE DEAL
BACK TO RUSSIA?
>> MY CLIENT AS HIS WIFE WERE
ALWAYS -- YOU KNOW, THAT WAS
THEIR FIRST CONCERN IS THEIR
KIDS, BUT IT WAS NOT PART OF THE
PLEA ARRANGEMENT.
THE PLEA ARRANGEMENT WAS JUST
REALLY THAT THEY WOULD ADMIT
CERTAIN FACTS, MINIMAL FACTS.
THEIR NAME AND THAT THEY WERE
RUSSIAN CITIZENS AND THAT THEY
HAD ACTED IN THE UNITED STATES
AT THE DIRECTION OF THE RUSSIAN
FEDERATION.
AND THAT THEY WOULD BE ON A
PLANE BACK TO MOSCOW ON THURSDAY
NIGHT.
AND --
>> Emily: AND THAT THE KIDS
WOULD ALREADY BE THERE?
>> YEAH.
>> Emily: COULD THOSE CHILDREN
HAVE STAYED IN THE COUNTRY IF
THEY HAD CHOSEN TO?
>> I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO
THAT.
I THINK THE ANSWER IS YES, BUT
I'M NOT SURE.
>> Emily: DO YOU KNOW WHAT
NATIONALITY THEY ARE?
>> I CAN'T COMMENT ON THAT.
I WON'T TALK ABOUT THE KIDS.
>> Emily: BECAUSE IT HASN'T BEEN
REPORTED.
I DON'T KNOW IF THEY'RE
OR RUSSIA.
CAN THEY RETURN TO THE COUNTRY?
>> I THINK THEY CAN.
THROUGHOUT THE TEN-YEAR
INVESTIGATION THERE'S NO
SUGGESTION THAT THE GOVERNMENT
HAD ANY BEEF OR GRIEVANCE WITH
THE KIDS OR THAT THE KIDS HAD
ANY ROLE WHATSOEVER.
SO THE KIDS -- ONE OF WHOM IS AN
ADULT.
>> Emily: YEAH, 20 AND 16.
>> IT WILL BE UP TO THE KIDS TO
DECIDE HOW THEY WANT TO MAKE THE
DECISIONS FOR THEMSELVES IN THE
FUTURE.
>> Emily: DO YOU KNOW IF THE
KIDS KNEW THEIR PARENTS' LINE OF
WORK?
>> I DON'T.
I BELIEVE THEY DID NOT.
>> Emily: YOU BELIEVE THEY DID
NOT.
SKEPTICAL ABOUT WHAT THEY DID.
WELL, WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN
NOW?
ARE YOU CONTINUING TO BE -- TO
REPRESENT THEM?
I MEAN, WHAT KIND IS -- IS THIS
A DONE DEAL?
IS THE LEGAL ORDEAL OVER?
>> I HOPE IT IS.
I HOPE THAT THE GOVERNMENT WILL
RETURN THE PROPERTY OF ANDREY
BEZRUKOV TO ME AS THEY HAVE
AGREED.
I ASSUME WE'LL BE ABLE TO TAKE
CARE OF THAT IN RELATIVELY SHORT
ORDER.
AND THAT WILL PROBABLY BRING
EVERYTHING TO A CLOSE.
>> Emily: THE GOVERNMENT WILL
SEIZE THE HOUSE?
HOW DOES THAT WORK?
>> YES.
THAT'S THE STANDARD FORFEITURE
PROCEDURE.
>> Emily: WAS THERE A MORTGAGE
ON THE HOUSE?
>> THERE WAS.
>> Emily: SO THEY ASSUME THAT?
>> NO, USUALLY THE PROPERTY GETS
SEIZED BY THE GOVERNMENT AND THE
MORTGAGE GETS PAID OFF FIRST AND
THEN WHAT EVER IS LEFT OVER GOES
TO THE GOVERNMENT.
>> Emily: HOW DID MR. HEATHFIELD
FIND YOU?
WAS IT FAIRLY ARBITRARY OR DID
YOU FIND THEM BEFORE?
>> I HOPE IT WASN'T ARBITRARY,
BUT I DIDN'T KNOW THEM BEFORE.
I WAS REFERRED TO THEM.
>> Emily: WHAT IS YOUR
EXPERTISE?
>> I DO CRIMINAL DEFENSE AND
COMMERCIAL LITIGATION.
>> Emily: BUT NOT NECESSARILY
ANYTHING TO DO WITH
INTERNATIONAL YOU KNOW,
ESPIONAGE?
>> NO.
I THINK THERE'S VERY FEW WITH
INTERNATIONAL ESPIONAGE IN THE
LEGAL COMMUNITY.
>> Emily: THIS HAS TO BE HIGH
PROFILE AND THERE'S A WHIMSICAL
ASPECT TO IT AND I DON'T MEAN TO
BELITTLE THE IDEA THAT THEY
MIGHT HAVE BEEN HERE UNDER
NEFARIOUS PURPOSE, BUT IT'S GOT
TO BE INTRIGUING TO YOU.
>> YEAH, A FASCINATING TEN DAYS.
BETWEEN THE TIME THEY WERE
ARRESTED AND THE TIME THEY WERE
ON PLANE TO MOSCOW I THINK IT
WAS ABOUT TEN DAYS.
>> Emily: HOW MUCH TIME DID YOU
GET TO SPEND WITH THEM BEFORE --
>> FAIR AMOUNT.
FOR ME, I SAW A SIDE OF THE U.S.
FOREIGN POLICY THAT I HAD NEVER
SEEN.
>> Emily: FLATTERING OR
UNFLATTERING?
>> WELL, DECISIONS WERE MADE AT
A VERY HIGH LEVEL.
THEY WERE ON A PLANE ON THURSDAY
NIGHT.
ON TUESDAY, BEFORE THE THURSDAY
JUST TWO DAYS BEFORE, I LEARNED
THAT THE TERMS OF THE DEAL AND
THIS THE DEAL HAD BEEN ARRANGED
AT A VERY HIGH LEVEL.
I LEARNED THE TERMS OF DEAL FROM
A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
RUSSIAN -- FROM THE RUSSIAN
EMBASSY.
>> Emily: REALLY?
>> I HAD NOT HAD CONFIRMATION
FROM ANY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
ATTORNEY.
SO I LEFT THE RUSSIAN EMBASSY
OFFICIAL AT QUARTER TO 10:00 ON
THE MORNING, I GOT ON THE PHONE
TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
THE U.S. ATTORNEY IN NEW YORK, I
TOLD HIM I UNDERSTOOD THERE WAS
A DEAL.
HE SAID I DON'T KNOW.
I'LL HAVE TO GET BACK TO YOU.
IT WAS MY IMPRESSION EITHER THAT
HE DIDN'T KNOW THE TERMS OF THE
DEAL YET, WHICH HAD JUST BEEN
NEGOTIATED BY THE CIA AS I
UNDERSTAND IT AS HAS BEEN
REPORTED, OR HE DIDN'T HAVE
AUTHORIZATION YET TO DISCUSS IT
WITH ME.
BUT I HAD LEARNED THE TERMS OF
THE DEAL FROM THE RUSSIAN
FEDERATION AND HE CALLED ME 45
MINUTES LATER, AND HE SAID, YES,
WHAT YOU HAD GOTTEN FROM THE
RUSSIAN REPRESENTATIVE ARE
CORRECT.
THAT'S NOT THE WAY CRIMINAL
CASES USUALLY WORK.
>> Emily: THAT IS FASCINATING.
>> SO IT WAS REALLY -- AND
ANOTHER THING THAT THE PERSON
FROM THE RUSSIAN EMBASSY TOLD ME
ON TUESDAY MORNING WAS THAT
MR. HEATHFIELD AND MS. FOLEY
WILL BE ON A PLANE ON THURSDAY
NIGHT.
THEY HAVE TO BE ON A PLANE ON
THURSDAY NIGHT.
AND SURE ENOUGH, IT HAPPENED.
FASCINATING.
>> Emily: WERE THEY SAD AT ALL
ABOUT LEAVING, DID THEY EXPRESS
REMORSE?
>> THAT REALLY GOES TO MY
DISCUSSIONS WITH THE CLIENT.
BUT I THINK IT WAS A VERY
DISRUPTIVE THING.
IT WAS DISRUPTIVE FOR THEIR
FAMILY, IT WAS DISRUPTIVE FOR
THEM PERSONALLY.¶
IT WAS DISRUPTIVE TO THE WAY
THEY HAD LIVED THEIR LIVES FOR
THE LAST TEN YEARS.
>> Emily: PETER KRUPP,
FASCINATING.
GREAT TALE.
THANKS FOR COMING.
WHEN WE CONTINUE, FIRE DESTROYED
THE BEACON HILL LOCATION.
NOW THE DeLUCA'S ON NEWBERRY
STREET IS SHUTTERED FOR OTHER
PROBLEMS.